Elana's Pantry Forums » ingredients

Agave Nectar - the HFCS health food fraud

(15 posts)
  • Started 1 year ago by Pescetarian
  • Latest reply from jessica
  • 3 Members Subscribed To Topic
  1. I found this article from another healthy-food-group forum, and wanted to post it here in case someone wasn't aware or would want to be aware of this. I have already taken my most recently purchased Agave bottle back to the store and thrown away my almost-empty bottle. I'll be sticking with honey from now on.

    "NaturalNews) Editor's note: This highly-controversial article was written by a Citizen Journalist writer, not an in-house NaturalNews staff writer. NaturalNews does not agree with every statement in this story, but we posted it because we are aware of an increasing amount of fraudulent, low-quality "agave" products in the marketplace, and we think a public discussion on agave nectar product is of value. Some readers have pointed out that some of the sources mentioned in this article have conflicts of interest, as they are aligned with competing products such as brown rice syrup. It's up to you, the discerning reader, to decide what to make of this article. I plan to provide more coverage of this topic in the future, and we are currently looking at the agave nectar industry in an effort to separate fact from fiction. Right now, I can confidently say there is a lot of fraud in the agave industry, much like there was in the olive oil industry a few years ago. - Mike Adams, editor of NaturalNews.com

    Here is the complete article as written by Rami Nagel:

    Agave nectar is advertised as a "diabetic friendly," raw, and a "100% natural sweetener." Yet it is none of these. The purpose of this article is to show you that agave nectar is in reality not a natural sweetener but a highly refined form of fructose, more concentrated than the high fructose corn syrup used in sodas. Refined fructose is not a 'natural' sugar, and countless studies implicate it as a sweetener that will contribute to disease. Therefore, agave nectar is not a health building product, but rather a deceptively marketed form of a highly processed and refined sweetener.

    Agave nectar is found on the shelves of health food stores primarily under the labels, "Agave Nectar 100% Natural Sweetener," (1) and "Organic Raw Blue Agave Nectar." (2) In addition, it can be found in foods labeled as organic or raw, including: ketchup, ice-cream, chocolate, and health food bars.

    The implication of its name, the pictures and descriptions on the product labels, is that agave is an unrefined sweetener that has been used for thousands of years by native people in central Mexico. Botanically, agave plants are in the lily order Liliales and the order Asparagales (depending on which botanical taxonomic system you use) both of which define agave as a flowering plant. For "thousands of years natives to central Mexico used different species of agave plants for medicine, as well as for building shelter," so claims the fanciful pedigree of this plant. Natives would also allow the sweet sap/liquid of the agave to ferment naturally, which created a mildly alcoholic beverage with a very pungent flavor known as 'pulque'. They also made a traditional sweetener from the agave sap/juice (miel de agave) by simply boiling it for several hours. But, as one agave seller explains, the agave nectar purchased in stores is neither of these traditional foods: "Agave nectar is a newly created sweetener, having been developed during the 1990's." (3)

    What is Agave Nectar?

    The principal constituent of the agave is starch, such as what is found in corn or rice. The process in which the agave starch is converted into refined fructose and then sold as the sweetener agave nectar is through an enzymatic and chemical conversion that refines, clarifies, heats, chemically alters, centrifuges, and filters the non-sweet starch into a highly refined sweetener, fructose. Here, a distinction must be made. Fructose is not what is found in fruit. Commonly, fructose is compared with its opposite and truly naturally occurring sweetener, known as 'levulose'. There are some chemical similarities between fructose (man made) and levulose (made by nature), and so the synthetically refined sugar fructose was labeled in a way to make one believe it comes from fruit. Levulose is not fructose even though people will claim it is. Russ Bianchi is Managing Director and CEO of Adept Solutions, Inc., a globally recognized food and beverage development company. Russ explains:

    "If fructose were natural, I would be able to go out to corn field and get a bucket of sweetener. I can go to a beehive and get honey that I can eat without processing it. I can go to an apple tree and pick an apple and eat it. I cannot go out into a cornfield, squeeze corn, and get fructose syrup, and I cannot go into an agave field, and get the product sold on retail shelves, as agave nectar. Falsely labeled agave fructose and high fructose corn syrup are both products of advanced chemistry and extensive food processing technology." (4) Mr. Bianchi has an insider's view of the health food industry and the food creation industry, having worked in the industry for decades.

    Take water for example. We all know that the chemical formula for water is H2O: two hydrogens and one oxygen. The opposite would be O2H, which is nothing close to water. Likewise, man-made fructose would have to have the chemical formula changed for it to be levulose, so it is not levulose. Saying fructose is levulose is like saying that margarine is the same as butter. Refined fructose lacks amino acids, vitamins, minerals, pectin, and fiber. As a result, the body doesn't recognize refined fructose. Levulose, on the other hand, is naturally occurring in fruits, and is not isolated but bound to other naturally occurring sugars. Unlike man-made fructose, levulose contains enzymes, vitamins, minerals, fiber, and fruit pectin. Refined fructose is processed in the body through the liver, rather than digested in the intestine.(5) Levulose is digested in the intestine. Refined fructose robs the body of many micronutrient treasures in order to assimilate itself for physiological use. While naturally occurring fruit sugars contain levulose bound to other sugars, high fructose corn syrup contains "free" (unbound), chemically refined fructose. Research indicates that free refined fructose interferes with the heart's use of key minerals like magnesium, copper and chromium. (6)

    The reason why refined fructose is used so commonly as a sweetener is simple: it's extremely cheap in cost.

    Agave nectar, as a final product, is mostly chemically refined fructose, anywhere from 70% and higher according to the agave nectar chemical profiles posted on agave nectar websites. The refined fructose in agave nectar is much more concentrated than the fructose in high fructose corn syrup. For comparison, the high fructose corn syrup used in sodas is 55% refined fructose. High fructose corn syrup is made with genetically modified enzymes. Is agave syrup (refined fructose) made the same way?

    "They are indeed made the same way, using a highly chemical process with genetically modified enzymes. They are also using caustic acids, clarifiers, filtration chemicals and so forth in the conversion of agave starches into highly refined fructose inulin that is even higher in fructose content than high fructose corn syrup", says Mr. Bianchi. Inulin is a chain of chemically refined fibers and sugars linked together, and, this bears repeating, high fructose inulin has more concentrated sugar than high fructose corn syrup!

    In a confidential FDA letter, Dr. Martin Stutsman (from the Food and Drug Administration's Office of Labeling Enforcement) explains the FDA's food labeling laws related to Agave Nectar: "Corn syrup treated with enzymes to enhance the fructose levels is to be labeled 'High Fructose Corn Syrup.'" According to Mr. Stutsman, agave, whose main carbohydrate is starch, requires the label "hydrolyzed inulin syrup." Even though, like corn, agave is a starch processed with enzymes, it does not require the label high fructose agave syrup because the resulting refined fructose sweetener is so sweet that it is chemically closer to inulin.

    From this point forward, agave nectar will be referred to by a more accurate name: agave syrup. This name is also legally uncomplicated and non-deceptive, per US Federal labeling laws, even though the true name would be hydrolyzed high fructose inulin syrup. "The product called 'agave nectar' is really chemically refined hydrolyzed high fructose, which is intentionally mislabeled to deceive consumers," states Mr. Bianchi.

    In a stunning report released in October 2008, the U.S. government's own accountability office reported that of the thousands of food products imported into the US each year from 150 countries, just 96 total food items were inspected by the FDA to insure label accuracy and food safety. (7) The FDA doesn't usually protect consumers regarding food safety or food labeling, nor does it usually take action against many misleading labels. This was seen with the processed infant formula scandal from China, where infant milk powder was tainted with toxic melamine.

    High Fructose Agave's Dubious History

    In the year 2000, with warrants in hand, federal agents from the Office of Criminal Investigations of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) came banging on the door of North America's largest agave nectar distributor, Western Commerce Corporation in California. In an extremely rare case of the FDA protecting consumer interests (rather than supporting big business, while shutting down legitimate and health consciousness competition), they discovered that Western Commerce Corporation was adulterating their agave syrup with high fructose corn syrup (to lower the cost even more and increase profit margins). While the federal agents confiscated the material in the warehouse, the owners of Western Commerce Corporation were nowhere to be found. Those who ran the company fled the country with millions of dollars in assets to avoid criminal prosecution.

    This adulterated agave syrup (refined fructose) was also labeled as certified organic (8) to fool consumers into thinking they were getting a pure product. This shows you how unverified organic labels were used in the USA, and continue being used even now.

    Today, high fructose agave syrup is made primarily by two companies, Nekulti, and IIDEA. Yet a third agave marketer, by the name of 'Volcanic,' has a suspicious claim on their website. "If your agave comes from one of the other two companies in Mexico, something has been added." (9) They are referring to Nekulti and IIDEA. Their claim is based upon an analysis, which claims that their agave nectar has a lower refined fructose level.

    Blue Agave Nectar is Not a Safe Sweetener

    When the Spaniards came to the New World, around 1535, they brought with them a
    desire for brandy. When their supplies ran out they had to find a new alcoholic beverage to replace their lost brandy. The Spaniards found that by distilling the juice of the plant now known as the blue agave plant they could produce a potent alcoholic beverage, which over time has evolved into what we now call tequila. In order to produce a sweetener from the blue agave plant, the entire pineapple -like, giant root bulb of the plant is removed from the earth. It is then dried and juiced, making an agave starch juice. This in no way resembles any form of traditional use of the blue agave plant. While great for distilling tequila, the blue agave plant, when transformed through a chemical process into refined fructose, may contain many properties that make them dangerous and toxic for regular human consumption.

    "Yucca species, together with other agaves, are known to contain large quantities of saponins," according to Tyler's Honest Herbal. Saponins in many varieties of agave plants are toxic steroid derivatives, as well as purgatives, and are to be avoided during pregnancy or breastfeeding because they might cause or contribute to miscarriage. These toxins have adverse effects on non-pregnant people and many health compromised consumer categories as well. They are known to contribute to internal hemorrhaging by destroying red blood cells, and they may gravely negatively harm people taking statin and high blood pressure drugs. Agave may also stimulate blood flow in the uterus.(10) Other first hand reports indicate agave may promote sterility in women. Since the agaves used for agave syrup are not being used in their traditional way, there should be a warning label on the sweetener packages that it may promote miscarriage during pregnancy, through weakening the uterine lining.

    What's Wrong With Fructose?

    Once eaten, refined fructose appears as triglycerides in the blood stream, or as stored body fat. Elevated triglyceride levels, caused by consumption of refined fructose, are building blocks for hardening human arteries. Metabolic studies have proven the relationship between refined fructose and obesity.(11) Because fructose is not converted to blood glucose, refined fructose doesn't raise nor crash human blood glucose levels -- hence the claim that it is safe for diabetics. Supposedly, refined fructose has a low glycemic index, and won't affect your blood sugar negatively. But the food labels are deceptive. Refined fructose is not really safe for diabetics. "High fructose from agave or corn will kill a diabetic or hypoglycemic much faster than refined white sugar," says Mr. Bianchi. "By eating high fructose syrups, you are clogging the veins, creating inflammation, and increasing body fat, while stressing your heart. This is in part because refined fructose is foreign to the body, and is not recognized by it."

    The average person consumes about 98 pounds of highly refined corn fructose per year in the USA, that roughly translates into half a cup of refined fructose per day. In an average supermarket, at least 2/3 of all items contain some form of highly refined fructose, because it is one of the cheapest ingredients and fillers for foods, next to water, air, and salt. In health food stores, some foods contain a sweetener called crystalline fructose or other sweeteners labeled as fructose. Essentially, these are all refined corn fructose, labeled in a way to trick people that it is something more natural. Mr. Bianchi concludes:

    "The simple answer tends to be the correct one. There is no land of milk and agave. Milk comes from goats, cows, humans, etc., and honey comes from bees. What I want people to understand is that mislabeling a sweetener like agave syrup is about money and profit, to the real determent of your health. The unethical factor is that the natural health food business has gone to great lengths in the case of agave to defraud consumers, by deceiving and lying to those who are trying to seek better health. There is something ethically worse about a company pretending to sell something all natural to people seeking health, than a mainstream company not pretending that their food is healthier. For example, nobody selling fast and junk foods is advocating it is health food. When you are in a natural health food store, you expect to pay extra money for something that is good for you. We have con artists here, pretending to deliver better health at a higher cost, when in reality it is equal to, or much worse than the many other sweeteners or harmful junk food. People are expecting to receive health, and are intentionally being defrauded for profit."

    Amber Agave Syrup (refined fructose)

    Agave syrup (refined fructose) comes in two colors: clear or light, and amber. What is this difference? Mr. Bianchi explains, "Due to poor quality control in the agave processing plants in Mexico, sometimes the fructose gets burned after being heated above 140 degrees Fahrenheit, it creates a darker, or amber color."

    Chain Food Stores and Health Food Stores

    When Western Commerce Corporation was shut down, due to their agave syrup alteration scheme in 2000, the big guys in the food industry stayed away from any agave syrups. They knew better than to risk lawsuits, and health consumer fraud. "They were clear that agave was criminally mislabeled per US Code Of Federal Regulation labeling laws, with an untried sweetener, new to the market, that contained saponins, and was not clearly approved as safe for use." explains Mr. Bianchi. For many years following this bust agave syrup was not used.

    But recently, some sellers in the agave syrup field, once quiet, have begun sneaking back into the food and beverage chain. And retail food giants like Whole Foods, Wegman's, Trader Joes and Kroger, (12) who should know better, and who should know the food labeling laws and requirements, still have no hesitation in selling the toxic, unapproved, and mislabeled refined fructose agave syrup, as well as products containing it. Mr. Bianchi explains the legality of this practice. "The simple answer here, again, tends to be the correct one. The stores carry agave products knowing that if they are caught, the legal responsibility will be on the agave sellers and producers, and not the stores. They will just pull it off the shelves. They may also be victims themselves and lied to by the purveyors and sellers of agave products. So long as agave products are profitable, the stores will carry them, regardless of fraudulent labeling or health concerns. Stores will continue to carry agave until consumer fraud complaints to local district attorneys, consumer unions, class action litigation or severe reactions like death ensue."

    Conclusions on Agave Syrup

    Without the FDA making efforts to enforce food-labeling laws, consumers cannot be certain that what they are eating is even what the label says it is. New sweeteners like agave syrup (refined fructose) were made to coin a profit, and not to help or assist vital health. Due to the lies from many companies who sell agave syrup (refined fructose), you have been led to believe that it is a safe and a natural sweetener. The retail refined agave syrup label does not explain that it goes through a complicated chemical refining process of enzymatic digestion, which converts the starch into the free, man-made chemical fructose that has a direct link to serious the degenerative disease conditions so prevalent in our culture. While high fructose agave syrup won't spike your blood sugar levels, the fructose in it will cause: mineral depletion, liver inflammation, hardening of the arteries, insulin resistance leading to diabetes, cardio-vascular disease, obesity, and may be toxic for use during pregnancy.

    If you want to buy something sweet, get a piece of fruit, not a candy bar labeled as a "health food." If you want to create something sweet, use sweeteners that are known to be safer. For uncooked dishes, unheated raw honey or dates work well. For cooked dishes or sweet drinks, a good organic maple syrup, or even freshly juiced apple juice or orange juice can provide delicious and relatively safe sweetness. In general, to be healthy, we cannot eat sugar all day, no matter how natural the form of sugar is, or is claimed to be. One should limit total sweetener consumption to approximately 10% of daily calories. Or one sweet side dish per day, (like a bowl of fruit with yogurt.)

    While it may be depressing news to hear about the lack of standards in the health food world, let this news help encourage you to seek access to more pure and unrefined foods and sweetener sources, so that you can be healthier."

    source: http://www.naturalnews.com/024892.html

    Posted 1 year ago #
  2. Sozo
    Member

    Hi Pescetarian, it is a concern with all the information floating around about agave nectar. Personally i have alot of allergys, I find that agave nectar is about the only sweetner i can have, also stevia sometimes (in recipes only). I can't have any honey, sugar or other sweetners. I have been using agave now for four years, no problems at all, it doesn't raise my blood sugar at all, i have also got my brother onto it who is diabetic, it doesn't spike his blood either. Recently i did full blood testings, everything come back perfect (to my doctors suprise). I personally don't believe everything i read, i go by how i feel after i eat something. Agave does no harm to me. i would becareful with the brand you use, i know if mine had some other form of sweetner in it i would know for sure, (sick for days) Thanks for the information it is interesting.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  3. gks
    Member

  4. mtkoren
    Member

    Interesting topic - I wonder if Elana is also looking into this - I mean we're dealing with something much worse than High Fructose Corn syrup. I'm aghast!

    Today I saw a new article from Mercola on high fructose in the diet. He doesn't deal with Agave, surprisingly given this article, but if it really is 70% plus fructose then this is indeed a very serious issue.

    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/05/16/Dont-Believe-the-Hype-Fructose-Truly-is-Much-Worse-Than-Glucose.aspx

    The only thing I really don't get in this article is the distinction between fructose and levulose because all dictionaries and sources speaking of these terms say they are interchangeable and mean the same thing. If this is true, then Rami is stretching things a bit by making Levulose include a bunch of active ingredients and fructose is like levulose without all those various ingredients that come naturally with living systems. Since he doesn't go into this, it sort of sucks a little of the wind out of his credibility.

    Michael

    Posted 10 months ago #
  5. Ninufar
    Member

    This article and the longer one (see other post in Ingredients titled "new article on agave nectar") by Nagel and Sally Fallon Morell raise interesting questions, both about how the agave is processed, and about how they base many of their claims against agave by citing personal communication from one "industry insider" -- including direct quotes which are really that insider talking about a confidential letter written by someone else. (It's like that song, "Things that make you go HMMmmm"...)

    It would be good to have some independent information to go beyond critiques of a former agave syrup producer and the rebuttal from the current producer. And I doubt many readers on this blog would suggest we all get 25% of our daily caloric intake from agave-sweetened beverages, to try to be like the HFCS-study participants Mercola covered!

    Myself, I have not tried cooking with agave yet -- I substitute applesauce or pear juice in Elana's recipes -- but then I'm very sensitive to sweeteners. The physical health side is important to me, but avoiding stuff that triggers cravings is my top priority... and sweet foods are trickier for me than, say, fried ones. For people w/o any history of wacked-out eating behavior, it may not be a big deal! Seems like more information is needed to compare Madhava's syrup to maple syrup on refined-ness. Meantimes, listening to one's own body is always a good start in my book.

    Posted 10 months ago #
  6. I've had concerns about agave syrup for some time. I can't verify the fraud claims in the post above, but I can't find any credible information that verifies agave syrup as a traditional food, either.

    My main concern is due to the fructose content and that's the main reason I don't use it (or corn syrup or cane sugar). Concentrated doses of fructose (far higher than found in natural fruit), especially on a regular basis as I've seen some people liberally use it, is biochemically bad news to the body (for all sorts of reasons, starting with creating a fatty liver, abdominal fat, deranged blood lipids (elevated triglycerides), and inappropriate attachment to proteins, resulting in AGEs - gummed up cells which are unable to carry out their function, resulting in the similar damage to that which happens in diabetic complications due to chronic, long-term toxic exposure to glucose). I verified my interpretation of the biochemistry with my husband's colleague, a glycobiologist. That's enough for me.

    I use a bit of raw honey and maple syrup, occasionally some small amounts of granulated cane sugar, and whatever small amounts of sugar are in the very dark chocolates we use (75%-99%). But mostly I have just learned to live without much concentrated sugar, though it was a gradual process, except on rare occasions (and even then in relatively modest amounts that fit with my tight glucose parameters). My family is adjusting to little sugar, too. We all feel better, don't put on inappropriate weight anymore, and our energy land moods evels are more even. My son happily drinks unsweetened hot cocoa, for instance, though that didn't happen overnight (I gradually reduced it over about a year). On the rare occasions I bake gluten-free cakes or muffins (we're more of an ice cream or mousse family) I use half or less of the recommended sugar. It takes some time to get used to little or no sugar, but the true taste of foods comes through better without the overwhelming taste of concentrated sugars (fresh romaine can actually taste slightly sweet if one's taste buds are again sensitized). I think it is a bit easier to go low sugar with occasional rich, creamy treats than it is with baked grain foods that are really blah without a sweet taste (I tend to not make grain foods for other reasons anyway). The rest of the world seems to have a harder time cutting back on sugars, always trying to find some sort of "free lunch" sweetener.

    Posted 10 months ago #
  7. I have been worried about agave for a bit, and I have found a few places that do discuss the health hazards of it. It makes me sad because I especially adore Coconut Bliss ice cream!

    http://foodarazzi.com/?p=479

    I worry about the fructose content and the effect on the liver.

    I have also done a little looking into coconut sugar (palm sugar) and that seems a bit healthier than agave. It is called jaggery and used in Indian cuisine.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaggery#Health_benefits

    http://www.thenourishinggourmet.com/2008/11/in-my-kitchen-coconut-sugar.html

    I would be very interested in your take on it.

    Posted 8 months ago #
  8. Hi - I think agave has its pros and cons. Adulterated agave is bad, for sure, but not all agave is that. Some is truly just agave juice, heated and processed much like maple syrup. Depends on the manufacturer. Some are putting out a decent product. I wrote a little booklet on Natural & Healthy Sweeteners with a whole section dedicated to agave and have done a bit of research. You can learn more here: http://eat2evolve.blogspot.com/search/label/natural%20and%20healthy%20sweeteners
    ❤ Diana

    Posted 8 months ago #
  9. Shari Galeano
    Member

    Goodness, I think all these post will scare the Agave right out of you!

    Posted 8 months ago #
  10. Judy
    Member

    I found these interesting links about agave and fructose (its main component). It has scared me off using agave till I learn more:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agave_nectar
    "...the extremely high percentage of fructose (higher than that of high-fructose corn syrup) can be deleterious and can trigger fructose malabsorption, metabolic syndrome[9], hypertriglyceridemia, decreased glucose tolerance, hyperinsulinemia, and accelerated uric acid formation."

    At: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fructose
    "Excess fructose consumption has been hypothesized to be a contributing cause of insulin resistance, obesity,[34] elevated LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, leading to metabolic syndrome[35]."

    (They don't define what "excess" fructose consumption means.)

    Posted 2 months ago #
  11. Franleigh
    Member

    Quote from WAPF - Sally Fallon Morell:
    "We urge consumers to read labels carefully," says Fallon, "and avoid any product containing HFCS or agave. Use moderate amounts of honey, maple sugar or syrup and palm sugar in homemade desserts. Even white sugar is a better choice than agave ‘nectar'."
    Source: http://www.westonaprice.org/Agave-Worse-than-Sugar-Nutrition-Foundation-Warns.html

    Posted 2 months ago #
  12. vyvyan
    Member

    Has anyone come up with a good substitute for agave using stevia.
    The only sensible sub I saw on this board was the 1/2 agave 1/2 stevia powder and then adding 1 egg for volume. Has anyone else tried this? I plan to try it next week as I have my stevia powder on order

    Posted 2 months ago #
  13. I am going to continue to use agave nectar. We have stevia and honey allergies at our house, but can all tolerate agave. I have read a statement from Mahadva, and feel confident using their product.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  14. katienowadley
    Member

    I have read all of the various "bashings" on agave, and the interesting thing, I think, is that they all quote Rami Nagel and his source Russ Bianchi. I think it is all tremendously more "fishy" than agave. I recommend that everyone think this through for themselves a little more, and notice the play on words that are used repeatedly throughout. Agave IS NOT HFCS nor is it processed the same. I have had the experience of working with several diabetics, and agave has changed their lives! Put yourselves in other people's shoes. If agave is not right for you - fine, but for many it has been a tremendous product that has led them to get off harmful sugars and regain health. I assure you, if you care AT ALL about what you put into your mouth, you could not consume the amount of agave that would have deleterious effects on your body!

    Posted 2 months ago #
  15. jessica
    Member

    @katienowadley good point!

    people need to realize that you shouldn't be eating baked goods all the time -- everything in moderation! especially sugars...

    Posted 2 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.